Learn › Strategies › Golden Cross (SMA 50/200) › QLD

Golden Cross (SMA 50/200) on QLD

ProShares Ultra QQQ: 2x daily leveraged Nasdaq-100, between QQQ and TQQQ in leverage. Backtest 2021-01-04 to 2026-10-02, $10,000 starting capital, computed by the same engine that runs live DeployQuant strategies.

Result: golden cross on QLD turned $10,000 into $19,160 (91.6% total, 12.0% CAGR): it trailed buy-and-hold by 11.6% per year, with a maximum drawdown 22.9 points shallower than holding (39.9% vs 62.8%).
12.0%CAGR
23.6%buy & hold CAGR
−39.9%max drawdown
0.53Sharpe ratio
3round trips
67%win rate
■ golden cross   ■ buy & hold, $10,000 invested 2021-01-04

Year by year

Yeargolden crossbuy & hold
202112.1%57.8%
2022−26.0%−59.7%
202363.6%113.2%
202442.3%42.1%
2025−15.5%29.9%
202617.3%39.2%

Month by month

YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
20210.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%6.6%3.5%1.6%
2022−16.9%−11.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
20230.0%0.0%7.3%0.3%15.0%12.2%7.0%−3.9%−10.3%−4.9%21.4%10.6%
20242.8%9.9%1.8%−9.3%12.3%12.0%−4.3%1.1%4.4%−2.5%10.0%0.1%
20253.5%−6.0%−15.5%−13.2%0.0%0.0%3.5%1.1%10.3%8.8%−3.8%−1.9%
20261.9%−5.1%−10.0%11.8%21.1%−1.6%−13.3%7.7%5.9%2.5%––

Every trade

golden cross on QLD made 3 closed round trips and one position still open at the end of the test, an average hold of 384 days, an average winner of 40.87%, an average loser of −17.42%, a profit factor of 4.35, a longest losing streak of 1. It held a position at the close on 62.3% of trading days.

EntryEntry priceExitExit priceReturnDays held
2021-10-19$39.202022-02-28$32.37−17.4%132
2023-03-24$22.902025-04-08$38.3967.6%746
2025-07-07$59.192026-04-08$67.5414.1%275
2026-04-30$80.12open–22.5%–

Prices are adjusted for splits and dividends, so they sit below the quotes printed at the time. An open position is marked at the last close.

Largest drawdowns

PeakLow pointDepthDays to lowRecoveredDays to recover
2024-12-162025-04-04−39.9%109not yet–
2021-11-192022-02-23−34.2%962023-07-12504
2024-07-102024-08-07−25.9%282024-11-0792

Buy-and-hold's deepest drawdown ran from 2021-11-19 to 2022-12-28 and reached −62.8%.

With trading costs

The headline run fills at the bar price. These runs charge slippage on every fill.

Slippage per fillCAGRMax drawdownFinal valueSharpe
None (headline)12.0%−39.9%$19,1600.53
5 basis points11.9%−39.9%$19,0760.53
10 basis points11.8%−39.9%$19,0170.52

Changing the parameters

VersionCAGRMax drawdownRound tripsWin rateFinal value
Published rules12.0%−39.9%367%$19,160
SMA 40/20012.3%−30.8%367%$19,496
SMA 50/15011.6%−36.3%367%$18,778
SMA 60/2508.8%−41.9%250%$16,204

How QLD behaved

MeasureQLD
Data in this test2021-01-04 to 2026-10-02 (1444 sessions)
Total return, buy and hold254.3%
Annualized volatility44.8%
Deepest drawdown−63.7% (2021-11-19 to 2022-12-28)
Up days54.3%
Average daily range3.14%
Average overnight gap1.19%
Correlation to SPY0.94
Correlation to QQQ1.00
Correlation to TLT0.09
Sessions above the 200-day average72.3%
Crossings of the 200-day average24
Falls of 10% or more from a 20-day high50

The rules

Hold while the 50-day average is above the 200-day; step aside when it crosses below (the death cross).

  1. WHEN the market opens · IF not invested AND SMA(50) > SMA(200) · THEN buy with 98% of the sleeve
  2. WHEN the market opens · IF invested AND SMA(50) < SMA(200) · THEN sell the whole position

A widely used trend filter. When the 50-day simple moving average is above the 200-day, the asset is in a long-term uptrend and the strategy holds. When it crosses below, the strategy moves to cash. It trades rarely, with a handful of signals per decade on an index. Its use is skipping the deepest bear markets, and it will lag some rallies.

Good for: long-horizon investors who want to hold trends but sidestep multi-year bear markets.
Watch out: crosses lag at turning points: the strategy gives back the first leg of a crash and misses the first leg of a recovery, and choppy sideways markets whipsaw it.

Run golden cross on QLD yourself, free →

Build it from blocks (or type it in English), backtest it on 5.7 years of minute data in seconds, tweak any parameter, then paper trade it on live data. No card, no broker needed to start.

Frequently asked questions

Did golden cross beat buy-and-hold on QLD?

Over 2021-01-04 to 2026-10-02, golden cross on QLD returned 12.0% annualized vs 23.6% for buy-and-hold: it trailed buy-and-hold by 11.6% per year, with a maximum drawdown 22.9 points shallower than holding (39.9% vs 62.8%).

How many trades did it make?

3 completed round trips over 5.7 years (7 fills), with 67% of round trips closing profitably.

How often does a golden cross happen?

On a broad index, roughly every couple of years. The backtest pages show the exact trade count for each ETF over the 2021 to 2026 window.

Golden cross vs buy and hold: which does better?

It depends on the asset and the window. Every backtest page here shows the same-window buy-and-hold comparison.

Related

Golden Cross (SMA 50/200) on all 59 ETFsfull results table All strategies on QLD12 templates compared RSI(14) Mean Reversion on QLDsame ETF, different rulesRSI(2) Dip Snapback on QLDsame ETF, different rules

Backtests are hypothetical, computed by DeployQuant's engine on minute-resolution consolidated US market data (2021-01-04 to 2026-10-02, $10,000 starting capital, no margin, no fees or slippage in the headline run; buy-and-hold puts 98% of the account in at the first open, as the templates do) and do not guarantee future results. Nothing on this page is investment advice. Live trading involves risk of loss.