LearnStrategiesSMA-200 Trend + 15% Trailing Stop › TMF

SMA-200 Trend + 15% Trailing Stop on TMF

Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X Shares — 3x daily leveraged long-term Treasuries — rate bets, amplified. Backtest 2021-01-04 → 2026-07-17, $10,000 starting capital, computed by the same engine that runs live DeployQuant strategies.

Result: trend + trailing stop on TMF turned $10,000 into $4,512 (−54.9% total, −13.4% CAGR) — it beat buy-and-hold by 17.3% per year, with a maximum drawdown 25.2 points shallower than holding (62.5% vs 87.7%).
−13.4%CAGR
−30.7%buy & hold CAGR
−62.5%max drawdown
-0.64Sharpe ratio
9round trips
22%win rate
trend + trailing stop   buy & hold — $10,000 invested 2021-01-04

Year by year

Yeartrend + trailing stopbuy & hold
20216.6%−19.0%
2022−13.6%−70.7%
2023−17.2%−10.4%
2024−30.4%−31.4%
2025−7.1%−1.9%
2026−8.5%−9.6%

The rules

Enter when price is above the 200-day average; exit only when a 15% trailing stop is hit.

  1. WHEN the market opens · IF not invested AND yesterday's close > SMA(200) · THEN buy with 98% of the sleeve
  2. WHILE invested · a managed trailing stop follows 15% below the position's high-water mark

A hybrid of the regime filter and the trailing stop: the 200-day average decides when to get in, but the exit belongs entirely to a 15% trail from the position's high-water mark. That asymmetry lets winners run far beyond the point where a crossover would have exited, at the cost of giving back 15% from every peak.

Good for: long trends with tolerable pullbacks; the 15% trail is wide enough to survive normal corrections.
Watch out: a 15% giveback from every peak is the tuition this strategy always pays; on choppy assets it re-enters above the 200-day repeatedly after each stop-out.

Run trend + trailing stop on TMF yourself — free →

Build it from blocks (or type it in English), backtest it on 5.5 years of minute data in seconds, tweak any parameter, then paper trade it on live data. No card, no broker needed to start.

Frequently asked questions

Did trend + trailing stop beat buy-and-hold on TMF?

Over 2021-01-04–2026-07-17, trend + trailing stop on TMF returned −13.4% annualized vs −30.7% for buy-and-hold — it beat buy-and-hold by 17.3% per year, with a maximum drawdown 25.2 points shallower than holding (62.5% vs 87.7%).

How many trades did it make?

9 completed round trips over 5.5 years (18 fills), with 22% of round trips closing profitably.

Why 15% rather than 10%?

Wider trails survive routine corrections in exchange for a bigger giveback at the end. Both numbers are one-field edits in DeployQuant — backtest both and compare.

Related

SMA-200 Trend + 15% Trailing Stop — all 59 ETFsfull results table All strategies on TMF12 templates compared RSI(14) Mean Reversion on TMFsame ETF, different rulesRSI(2) Dip Snapback on TMFsame ETF, different rules

Backtests are hypothetical, computed by DeployQuant's engine on minute-resolution consolidated US market data (2021-01-04 to 2026-07-17, $10,000 starting capital, no margin, fees and slippage not modeled) and do not guarantee future results. Nothing on this page is investment advice. Live trading involves risk of loss.