LearnStrategiesSMA 10/50 Trend › TQQQ

SMA 10/50 Trend on TQQQ

ProShares UltraPro QQQ — 3x daily leveraged Nasdaq-100 — huge trends and brutal drawdowns. Backtest 2021-01-04 → 2026-07-17, $10,000 starting capital, computed by the same engine that runs live DeployQuant strategies.

Result: SMA 10/50 trend on TQQQ turned $10,000 into $26,346 (163.5% total, 19.1% CAGR) — it trailed buy-and-hold by 3.2% per year, with a maximum drawdown 27.5 points shallower than holding (53.2% vs 80.8%).
19.1%CAGR
22.3%buy & hold CAGR
−53.2%max drawdown
0.64Sharpe ratio
18round trips
50%win rate
SMA 10/50 trend   buy & hold — $10,000 invested 2021-01-04

Year by year

YearSMA 10/50 trendbuy & hold
202123.7%88.9%
2022−45.8%−78.1%
2023102.2%187.4%
202431.2%61.2%
202530.6%33.9%
202613.5%25.0%

The rules

A faster moving-average crossover: hold while the 10-day average is above the 50-day.

  1. WHEN the market opens · IF not invested AND SMA(10) > SMA(50) · THEN buy with 98% of the sleeve
  2. WHEN the market opens · IF invested AND SMA(10) < SMA(50) · THEN sell the whole position

The golden cross's quicker sibling. Using 10- and 50-day averages catches intermediate trends measured in weeks rather than years — it enters recoveries earlier and exits breakdowns earlier, at the cost of more whipsaw trades in sideways markets. A good template for seeing how signal speed changes a strategy's character.

Good for: trending assets where multi-week swings are worth catching — leveraged index ETFs are a common pairing.
Watch out: several false signals a year is normal; each whipsaw costs a small loss and they add up in flat markets.

Run SMA 10/50 trend on TQQQ yourself — free →

Build it from blocks (or type it in English), backtest it on 5.5 years of minute data in seconds, tweak any parameter, then paper trade it on live data. No card, no broker needed to start.

Frequently asked questions

Did SMA 10/50 trend beat buy-and-hold on TQQQ?

Over 2021-01-04–2026-07-17, SMA 10/50 trend on TQQQ returned 19.1% annualized vs 22.3% for buy-and-hold — it trailed buy-and-hold by 3.2% per year, with a maximum drawdown 27.5 points shallower than holding (53.2% vs 80.8%).

How many trades did it make?

18 completed round trips over 5.5 years (36 fills), with 50% of round trips closing profitably.

Why 10 and 50 days?

A common intermediate-trend pairing — fast enough to react within weeks, slow enough to ignore single bad days. Both windows are editable parameters in DeployQuant.

Related

SMA 10/50 Trend — all 59 ETFsfull results table All strategies on TQQQ12 templates compared RSI(14) Mean Reversion on TQQQsame ETF, different rulesRSI(2) Dip Snapback on TQQQsame ETF, different rules

Backtests are hypothetical, computed by DeployQuant's engine on minute-resolution consolidated US market data (2021-01-04 to 2026-07-17, $10,000 starting capital, no margin, fees and slippage not modeled) and do not guarantee future results. Nothing on this page is investment advice. Live trading involves risk of loss.